Managing the Bid Process
Photo Credit: Image by Pixabay
The central step of procuring PPP projects is generally managing the bid process. This may follow pre-qualification to select the participating bidders (although not always, as described in Deciding the Procurement Strategy). The bid process ends with the selection of a preferred bidder, with whom the implementing then works to execute the contract and reach financial close. The steps in managing the bid process will vary depending on the chosen bid process and basis for award, as described in Deciding the Procurement Strategy under Bid process. This section describes and provides guidance on the following elements of managing the bid process: Farquharson et al (Farquharson et al. 2011, 121–124) provides an overview of the bid process and highlights some of the important points for implementing agencies to consider at this stage. The bid process formally begins when the government issues Request for Proposal (RFP) documents to participating bidders. These documents set out the project structure, requirements, and the details of the bid process. High-quality, detailed, and clear RFP documents are important to ensuring a competitive process and a PPP that achieves value for money. RFP documents typically include the following: Examples and Guidance on Preparing RFP Documents. For further examples, the World Bank PPPIRC website (PPPLRC) page Procurement Processes and Standardized Bidding Documents includes a link to a draft RFP for Power Purchase Agreements and a BTO PPP for roads, and links to actual bidding documents from PPP projects. The World Bank has also issued sample bidding documents for output and performance-based road contracts (WB 2006c), along with some guidance in the foreword to the documents. Examples and Guidance on Preparing RFP Documents After the RFP has been issued, bidders will prepare detailed proposals responding to its requirements. During this process, government needs to define how and to what extent it will interact with bidders as they prepare their proposals. Rules on the channels and permissible topics for interaction with bidders are usually set in the RFP—this is important for transparency. At a minimum, this interaction involves providing information to bidders and responding to requests for clarification on the RFP. In some cases, the government may consider updating the RFP documents as a result. Typical channels for these types of communication include: The following provide more information and examples of these approaches to interaction with bidders: As described in Negotiation with bidders: during bidding process under Deciding the Procurement Strategy, some governments use an interactive tender or competitive dialogue process involving more extensive engagement with bidders as they prepare their proposals. Under this type of process, bidders typically initially submit technical proposals, which are then the subject of feedback and discussion with the contracting authority, to refine the proposed solutions to meet the authority's needs, before submitting a final proposal. Some bidders may be dropped out of the process at different stages. For more detail and guidance on this procedure according to EU regulations, see the Government of the United Kingdom's Guidance on the Use of Competitive Dialogue (UK 2008). Australia's National PPP Practitioners' Guide (AU 2015, 70–71) describes how a similar interactive tender process is typically used in Australia. A reliable and credible system to ensure bids are handled confidentially is important, to prevent any opportunity for bid-tampering, and to protect commercially sensitive information in bids. Often bids are delivered in hard copy in sealed envelopes. Typically, financial and technical bids are delivered in separate envelopes—financial bids are only opened for bidders that pass the technical assessment, and are often opened publicly to avoid any possibility of bid tampering. For example, the Philippines BOT law rules and regulations set out a two-envelope system for receiving bids (PH 2006, Rule 7). The World Bank sample bidding documents for output- and performance-based road contracts (WB 2006c, 19–21) also describe a sealed-envelope bid system, but allow for use of an electronic sealed bid system as an alternative. One advantage of an electronic system is that it prevents bidders from monitoring or interfering with physical bid delivery. Dumol's diary of the Manila Water privatization by concession (Dumol 2000, 85–98) includes a detailed description of the process for bid submission and bid opening in practice. As described in the Partnerships Victoria Practitioners' Guide (VIC 2001, 40–42), the evaluation process involves Partnerships Victoria Practitioners' Guide (VIC 2001, Chapter 19.2) provides tips for evaluation, and lists what should be included in an evaluation report. South Africa PPP Manual Module 5: Procurement (ZA 2004a, 45–51) also provides detailed guidance on how to evaluate bids, as well as a description of South Africa's approach to defining evaluation teams. The selection of evaluation criteria can be key to ensuring the PPP provides value for money. Evaluation criteria should be decided in advance and set out in the RFP documentation. Some countries specify evaluation criteria options in legislation. Evaluation criteria typically incorporate technical and financial elements. These may be evaluated separately—typically with a pass/fail technical evaluation, followed by ranking on financial criteria) or combined and weighted to rank bids (as described in Deciding the Procurement Strategy under Basis for Award). The options for specific criteria depend on the nature of the project, as described (with examples) by Kerf et al (Kerf et al. 1998, 118–122)—for example, whether existing assets are involved, and whether the project will be user-pays or government-pays. Many PPPs are ranked based on a financial criterion subject to passing other technical and financial requirements. The most common option for a financial evaluation criterion is the remuneration of the private sector. This could be the lowest tariff to users, or lowest cost to government (whether as a government-pays PPP, or subsidy in addition to user charges). The Least Present Value of Revenue criterion, introduced in Chile and Peru for toll roads, is another alternative, described by Engel, Fischer and Galetovic (Engel et al. 2002). Related criteria can include length of concession, or amount of investment. Where technical requirements have been clearly set out in the proposal, technical evaluation requires checking compliance with those requirements. As Kerf et al (Kerf et al. 1998, 118–119) describe, in some processes bidders are asked to submit project design, business, or investment plans, which are evaluated based on multiple criteria. The authors note the drawbacks of this approach—including the possible subjectivity of assessing plans, and the likelihood of plans changing substantially over the lifetime of the concession. Procuring authorities should assess, with their transaction advisors, whether the project and the draft contract, as it is, are commercially viable and bankable—avoiding post-bid negotiations, before contract signing or before financial close, that may significantly change the project and its risk allocation, but that were not evaluated in the bid process. The risk-allocation implications of those post-bid negotiations may be far more significant than the user fees and other criteria assessed during the tender process. If allowing bidders to present, in their proposals, changes to the draft contract, procuring authorities should define which specific changes are allowed, and how they will be scored in the bid evaluation criteria. The following resources provide further guidance and examples on choosing evaluation criteria: Australia’s National PPP Practitioners’ Guide (AU 2015, 62–65) describes a more holistic approach to evaluating bids. It includes quantitative and qualitative Value for Money, commercial and financial evaluation, service delivery evaluation, and project design evaluation. If only one bid is received, this can raise concerns about whether that bid will provide value for money. As described in EPEC's Guide to Guidance (EPEC 2011b, 29–30) there are two broad options in this case, depending on the reason for only receiving one bid: World Bank procurement guidelines (WB 2011b, 25) note that rejection of all bids is justified where there is a lack of effective competition, but says “even when only one bid is submitted, the bidding process may be considered valid, if the bid was satisfactorily advertised, the qualification criteria were not unduly restrictive, and prices are reasonable in comparison with market value.” The United Kingdom Government's guidance on the competitive dialogue procedure (UK 2008, Box 5.7) provides further guidance. In some cases, despite multiple bids being received, there may not be a clear preferred bidder. For example, this could be because no bids conform to requirements; or because a non-conforming bid appears to present a better value-for-money option than conforming bids. One common cause of this problem is poor clarity or quality of the RFP documents—the references listed above under Preparing and issuing Request for Proposal documents provide guidance on preparing a clear, comprehensive, and well-structured RFP. The multi-stage and competitive dialogue procedures described in Deciding the Procurement Strategy also help avoid this issue, by enabling changes to the RFP during the bid process that help ensure final bids are all comparable and compliant. One option if no bids conform, and none appear to be of high quality, is simply to re-package and re-tender the project. The alternative is to extend the procurement process, to identify a preferred bidder—typically, through discussions with the higher-ranked bidders on the points where the bids do not conform, often followed by asking for a revised bid. For further guidance, see Australia's National PPP Practitioners' Guide (AU 2015, 27–28), which describes two options in cases where no preferred bidder can be selected—entering into a Best and Final Offer (BAFO) process with two bidders, or structured negotiations. The South Africa PPP Manual Module 5 (ZA 2004a, 51–56) also describes in detail when and how to run a BAFO process, if no clear preferred bidder can be identified. Once the preferred bidder has been selected, governments sometimes enter into further discussion to finalize the PPP contract. Extensive negotiation at this stage can undermine the competitive tender process, as described in Deciding the Procurement Strategy under Negotiation with bidders: post-bid. However, some level of negotiation may be necessary to clarify elements of the proposal or contract, particularly when the bid process has not included significant interaction. If financing arrangements have not already been finalized, lenders may also have demands at this stage that create pressure to negotiate on elements of the contract and risk allocation. Many governments define and limit the extent of negotiations possible at this stage. For example, the EPEC's Guide to Guidance (EPEC 2011b, 31) describes a European Union rule that no issues that are material to the procurement can be changed—that means that no change that could have resulted in a different result from the bidding process should be incorporated during the post-bid negotiation phase. Where changes are allowed at this stage, the final contract is often subject to further approval. The following resources provide guidance on carefully managing post-bid negotiations:
Preparing and issuing Request for Proposal documents
JURISDICTION
REFERENCE
DESCRIPTION
Australia
National PPP Practitioners’ Guide (AU 2015, 17–22)
Details the content of the RFP.
Brazil
Federal PPP Law (BR 2004a, Law 11079, Article 11)
Describes the minimum information that the tender documents must include. These are a draft PPP contract, the proposal guarantee required from the bidder (up to one percent of total contract amount), the conflict resolution procedures, and the guarantees that that government will make available to ensure its payments.
Chile
Concessions Law (CL 2010b)
The Chilean PPP Unit housed within the Ministry of Public Works provides access to the complete RFP of all their PPP projects.
Colombia
Law 80/1993, General Statute for Procurement by the Public Administration (CO 1993, Articles 14 and 30)
Article 24 describes the information that PPP tender documents must include. This includes: requirements to be eligible to participate as a bidder, rules for preparing bids, cost and quality of goods, works and services needed to carry out the project, term of the contract, and bidder selection rules. Article 30 sets out the tender process—including the rights and responsibilities of the actors involved, and deadlines and timeframes for each step.
Colombia
Law 1150 (2007) Law to Introduce Efficiency and Transparency Measures in Law 80 of 1993 (CO 2007, article 8)
Establishes that the contracting agency must publish a preliminary version of the tender documents. This is a non-binding activity—that is, the contracting agency is not forced to carry out the tender after publishing these preliminary documents.
India
Ministry of Finance Model RFP Document (IN 2014a)
Provides a full generic model RFP, intended for use by contracting authorities at the national level.
South Africa
PPP Manual module on procurement (ZA 2004a, 27–41)
Describes first how bidders can participate in finalizing the RFP; then describes in detail the content of the RFP.
Interacting with bidders during proposal preparation
Receiving bids
Evaluating bids
Dealing with issues—only one bid received
Dealing with issues—no clear preferred bidder or no conforming bids
Finalizing the PPP contract with the preferred bidder
Find in pdf at PPP Reference Guide - PPP Cycle or visit the PPP Online Reference Guide section to find out more.
Updated:
Related Content
INTRODUCTION
Page Specific DisclaimerVisit the PPP Online Reference Guide section to find out more.
PPP BASICS: WHAT AND WHY
Page Specific DisclaimerVisit the PPP Online Reference Guide section to find out more.
Featured Section LinksESTABLISHING THE PPP FRAMEWORK
Page Specific DisclaimerVisit the PPP Online Reference Guide section to find out more.
PPP CYCLE
Page Specific DisclaimerVisit the PPP Online Reference Guide section to find out more.
Identifying PPP Projects
Type of ResourceAppraising Potential PPP Projects
Type of ResourceStructuring PPP Projects
Type of ResourceDesigning PPP Contracts
Type of ResourceManaging PPP Transactions
Type of ResourceManaging PPP Contracts
Type of ResourceDealing with Unsolicited Proposals
Type of ResourceKey References - PPP Cycle
Type of Resource
Additional Resources
Managing the Bid Process in Asset Recycling
Type of ResourceRight Block TitleTABLE OF CONTENTSRight Block DescriptionI. GUIDELINES FOR IMPLEMENTING ASSET RECYCLING
3. Guidelines for Asset Identification
• Request for Qualification (RfQ) in Asset Recycling
• Request for Proposals (RfP) in Asset Recycling
• Managing the Bid Process in Asset Recycling
• Bid Evaluation and Award in Asset Recycling
• Contract Finalisation in Asset Recycling
• Towards Financial Close in Asset Recycling
Innovative Revenues for Infrastructure (IRI)
Page Specific DisclaimerThe Guidelines on Innovative Revenues for Infrastructure (IRI), prepared with the assistance of PWC, is intended to be a living document and will be reviewed at regular intervals. They have not been developed with any specific transaction in mind and are meant to serve only as general guidance. It is therefore critical that the Guidelines be reviewed and adapted for specific transactions.
To find more, visit the Innovative Revenues for Infrastructure section and the Content Outline, or Download the Full Report. For feedback on the content of this section of the website or suggestions for links or materials that could be included, please contact the Public-Private Partnership Resource Center at ppp@worldbank.org.
KeywordsFeatured Section LinksTable of contents TitleTable of ContentsTable of contents link/Innovative_Revenues_Infrastructure/Table_of_ContentsBanner Notice
Watch this space. The Guidelines on Innovative Revenues for Infrastructure (IRI) is intended to be a living document and will be reviewed at regular intervals.
Visit the Content Outline to find out more, or let us know what you think by taking a Quick Survey.