This is a new section of the Public-Private Partnership Resource Center website and is currently in draft form. Your feedback is welcome: If you would like to comment on the content of this section of the website or if you have suggestions for links or materials that could be included please contact us at ppp@worldbank.org.

Type of Resource
Right Block Title
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Right Block Description

UNLOCKING GLOBAL EMISSION REDUCTION CREDIT


Guidance for Countries in Assessing ERC Projects


1. Introduction to Emission Reduction Credits

 The World Bank's Emission Reduction Program

 Emission Reduction Credits

Classification of Emissions Reduction Credit

 Policy Context of Emissions Reduction Credit

2. Objective of the Guidance for Countries in Assessing ERC Projects

 Objective of Project Preparation Guidelines

 Introduction to the Project Assessment Framework

 Process to Conducting Assessments

3. Determining Country Inputs

 S1: Green Economy Priorities

 S3: Article 6 Readiness and Eligibility

4. Conducting the Initial Profiling and Making a Preliminary Decision

 F1: Project ERC Value

 F2: Additional Value Enabled by Project

 C1, C2, and C3: Carbon Integrity and Environmental and Social Risk Management

 S2: Socioeconomic Value

5. Conducting the Project Assessment and Making the Final Decision

 F1: Project ERC value and F2: Additional Value Enabled by Project

 Q1: MRV Infrastructure

 Q2: Marketing, Sales, and Pricing

 Q3: Project Governance and Structure

 C1: Carbon Integrity

 C2: Environmental Risk Management

 C3: Social Risk Management and Benefits

 S2: Socioeconomic Value

6. Further Guidance for Application

 Market-Driven Factors

 Country Context-driven Factors

 Considerations for Future Scope

Abbreviations: Guidance for Countries in Assessing ERC Projects

Appendices: 

• A: Project Profile Template 

• B: Project Assessment Template 

• C: PPP Models for ERP

  - Model 1: MRT Energy Efficiencies Model for ERP

  - Model 2: Rural Electrification Model for ERP

  - Model 3: LED Streetlight Deployment Model for ERP - for Efficient Outdoor and Street Lighting Technologies

  - Model 4: Rooftop Solar Installation Model for ERP

  - Model 5: LED Streetlight Deployment Model for ERP - for Specific Technologies

  - Model 6: E-bus Deployment Model for ERP

  - Model 7: EV Charging Systems Installation Model for ERP

  - Model 8: Biodigesters Deployment Model for ERP

  - Model 9: Waste-to-Power Model for ERP

  - Model 10: Waste Treatment Facility Model for ERP

  - Model 11: Climate Smart Farming Deployment Model for ERP

  -  Model 12: Reforestation Program Model for ERP

Find Full Outline

Rooftop Solar Installation Model for ERP

Photo Credit: Image by Freepik

On this page: Rooftop Solar Installation leveraging a New-Build-Bulk-Fees model  - Model 4 in the ERP Project Guidelines.  Read more below, or visit Strategic Guidance for Country System AssessmentsGuidance for Countries in Assessing ERC Projects, or Mobilizing ERC Finance


Project Type: Renewable Energy

Sector: Power

Applicable Project Methodology: AMS-I.F.: Renewable electricity generation for captive use and mini-grid

This project type involves setting up Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Panels on the rooftops of various locations. The project can help to generate adequate energy supply that can primarily meet the energy needs of the buildings themselves, with any surplus electricity being supplied back to the grid. This helps to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions through reduced consumption of fossil fuel power supply.

Proposed Structure of this Public Private Partnership (PPP) Model

The project will be leveraging a New-Build-Bulk-Fees model. This will involve the grantor, potentially a municipal government or state-owned entity, creating a new entity to coordinate and manage the installation of rooftop solar systems across participating buildings in the region. The new entity will also be managing the emission reduction credit (ERC) project, for which it will receive the ERCs issued to the project for the avoided emissions. To recover the installation costs, the new entity will be collecting fees from the building owners benefiting from the energy efficiency savings through a 10-year period.

Table 1: Model Attributes

Dimension
Attribute
Description

Business

New

This model assumes that a new state-owned entity will be created to manage the project

Existing

Construction

Build

The model involves the government or state-owned entity engaging a service contractor to install the rooftop solar systems in the participating buildings

Refurbish

Private Funding

Finance

The government or state-owned entity will provide initial financing for the project development in this model

Service

Bulk

The government or state-owned entity will collect payments from the participating buildings

User

Revenues

Fees

The revenues in this model will be pre-agreed fees based on the savings to be incurred by the participants

Tariffs

Proposed risk allocation of the Public Private Partnership Model

Key features of PPP structure

  • Government or state-owned entity engages private sector entity to design, build and maintain solar PV rooftop project
  • The government or state-owned entity provides financing of the project and earns the tariff paid by domestic consumers for electricity consumption
  • Any ERC proceeds will also go to the government or state-owned entity as additional revenue stream

Expected ERC end use

  • End use can belong to the government or state-owned entity as part of additional revenue stream

Key considerations/risks for proposed project

  • Extensive stakeholder engagement required to ensure buy-in from local stakeholders
  • Will need receive necessary approvals for development and commissioning for each solar PV plant
  • Need to work with grid operators to ensure stable good energy grid capabilities to connect rooftop solar with grid
  • Partnering with a service provider for the project’s marketing, sales and pricing is needed to identify potential offset buyers, negotiate contracts, and secure good target price per tonne to enable the financial viability of ERC generation
  • Contracting a monitoring, verification and reporting (MRV) service provider with experience in conducting MRV and preparing the necessary documents for generating ERCs in a voluntary carbon market standard will reduce risk of registration and issuance delays or bottlenecks, and strengthen credibility of project’s carbon integrity quality

Figure 1: Financing and Activity Flows for the Model

Case study: Grouped Rooftop Solar Project, India

Project description

The project entails the installation of Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Panels on rooftops across multiple states in India. The purpose of this project is to set up solar power plants primarily for self- consumption, and any excess electricity generated can be supplied to the grid. To achieve this, a net metering arrangement will be established with the state electricity board, allowing for the consumption of equivalent energy from the grid when necessary.

Targeted results

The annual average estimate of GHG emission reductions is 17,764 tonnes over a crediting period of 7 years.

Figure 2: Structure of Case Study PPP

The installation of Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Panels on rooftops in various Indian states is the focus of the project. Tata Power Renewable Energy is the project proponent for the various solar power plants grouped in this project. Through a net metering arrangement with the state electricity board, customers will consume equivalent energy from the grid, and they will only be charged for the net power they consume over a particular period. Excess electricity generated from the solar PV panels will be sold to the grid under the net metering agreement. Tata Power will also benefit from the payments received from consumers as well as any ERCs generated from this project.

Summary of the model financials

Assuming a similar project parameter as the case study, the project’s Net Present Value (NPV) without ERC in- and outflows – only considering non-ERC inflows through other revenue streams or cost savings enabled by the project – is negative at $ 0.7 million (M)1. With ERC cashflows, the project will improve to have a positive NPV of $ 0.6M, demonstrating the effectiveness of ERCs to enable the financial viability of such a project. Moreover, NPV of project may improve beyond project period as income from electricity sales recurs.

Table 2: Summary of sources of inflows and outflows and key assumptions

Value component
Assumptions
Sources

ERC revenues or inflows

  • Three issuances across the project’s 7-year crediting period, at year 3 and year 7
  • $4.71 per tonne today for 62,174 estimated tonnes of ERCs likely generated in the first issuance
  • 10% price increase to $5.18 for 62,174 estimated tonnes of ERCs likely generated for the second issuance

Average price of renewable energy project in Asia, Verified Carbon Standard (VCS) and Gold Standard (GS)

Non-ERC revenues or inflows

  • Estimated grid emission factor: 0.9305 tonnes per megawatt hours (MWh)
  • Estimated annual electricity consumption: 19,091 MWh
  • Solar PV efficiency rate: 20%
  • Estimated total electricity generation: 21,237 MWh
  • Electricity tariff rate: $0.16 per kilowatt hour (KWh)
  • Estimated annual excess electricity generation: 2,146 MWh

Solar Grouped Project case study benchmark, World Bank – Cost of Doing Business study, International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA)

Project investment and implementation cost

  • Solar PV capacity: 12,121 kW
  • Installation costs: $590 per kW
  • Annual O&M costs: $9.6 per kW
  • Operating and maintenance costs assumed to be 5% of total investment and installation costs

Solar Grouped Project case study benchmark

ERC generation

  • $10,000 for the project’s registration and first issuance
  • $15,000 for each verification process across two issuance cycles
  • $0.14 per tonne generated for issuances

Verra Fee Schedule

Table 3: Net cashflows summary (in USD)

Components
Sum of initial outlays
Sum of in- or outflows from crediting period
Total cashflow

ERC Component

Revenues/Inflows

0

3,264,135

3,264,135

Costs/Outflows

0

-57,409

-57,409

Net value

0

3,206,726

3,206,726

Primary/Non-ERC Component

Revenues/Inflows

0

6,923,150

6,923,150

Costs/Outflows

-5,163,708

-1,807,298

-6,971,006

Net value

-5,163,708

5,115,853

-47,855

Net Present Values

NPV

$651,345

NPV (ERC Component)

$1,378,329

NPV (Non-ERC Component)

-$726,984

 


Footnote 1: All prices are expressed in United States Dollars (USD)

Note(s):

This section is intended to be a living document and will be reviewed at regular intervals. The Guidelines have not been prepared with any specific transaction in mind and are meant to serve only as general guidance. It is therefore critical that the Guidelines be reviewed and adapted for specific transactions. Unless expressly stated otherwise, the findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in the Materials in this Site are those of the various authors of the Materials and are not necessarily those of The World Bank Group, its member institutions, or their respective Boards of Executive Directors or member countries. For feedback on the content of this section of the website or suggestions for links or materials that could be included, please contact the Public-Private Partnership Resource Center at ppp@worldbank.org.

 

 

Download Page as PDF


Updated:

UNLOCKING GLOBAL EMISSION REDUCTION CREDIT


Guidance for Countries in Assessing ERC Projects


1. Introduction to Emission Reduction Credits

 The World Bank's Emission Reduction Program

 Emission Reduction Credits

Classification of Emissions Reduction Credit

 Policy Context of Emissions Reduction Credit

2. Objective of the Guidance for Countries in Assessing ERC Projects

 Objective of Project Preparation Guidelines

 Introduction to the Project Assessment Framework

 Process to Conducting Assessments

3. Determining Country Inputs

 S1: Green Economy Priorities

 S3: Article 6 Readiness and Eligibility

4. Conducting the Initial Profiling and Making a Preliminary Decision

 F1: Project ERC Value

 F2: Additional Value Enabled by Project

 C1, C2, and C3: Carbon Integrity and Environmental and Social Risk Management

 S2: Socioeconomic Value

5. Conducting the Project Assessment and Making the Final Decision

 F1: Project ERC value and F2: Additional Value Enabled by Project

 Q1: MRV Infrastructure

 Q2: Marketing, Sales, and Pricing

 Q3: Project Governance and Structure

 C1: Carbon Integrity

 C2: Environmental Risk Management

 C3: Social Risk Management and Benefits

 S2: Socioeconomic Value

6. Further Guidance for Application

 Market-Driven Factors

 Country Context-driven Factors

 Considerations for Future Scope

Abbreviations: Guidance for Countries in Assessing ERC Projects

Appendices: 

• A: Project Profile Template 

• B: Project Assessment Template 

• C: PPP Models for ERP

  - Model 1: MRT Energy Efficiencies Model for ERP

  - Model 2: Rural Electrification Model for ERP

  - Model 3: LED Streetlight Deployment Model for ERP - for Efficient Outdoor and Street Lighting Technologies

  - Model 4: Rooftop Solar Installation Model for ERP

  - Model 5: LED Streetlight Deployment Model for ERP - for Specific Technologies

  - Model 6: E-bus Deployment Model for ERP

  - Model 7: EV Charging Systems Installation Model for ERP

  - Model 8: Biodigesters Deployment Model for ERP

  - Model 9: Waste-to-Power Model for ERP

  - Model 10: Waste Treatment Facility Model for ERP

  - Model 11: Climate Smart Farming Deployment Model for ERP

  -  Model 12: Reforestation Program Model for ERP

Find Full Outline