Approach for Cooperative Approaches
Photo Credit: Image by Freepik
On this page: Appendix A of Strategic Guidance for Country System Assessments cooperative approaches may also be beneficial across other market development activities. Read more below, or download the following reports: Strategic Guidance for Country System Assessments and Guidance for Countries in Assessing ERC Projects, or the Mobilizing ERC Finance Report.
Appendix A of Strategic Guidance for Country System Assessments Beyond capability development, cooperative approaches may also be beneficial across other market development activities. Cooperation, whether across countries, regions, or even cities, can help jurisdictions in similar contexts to combine resources and action towards developing high-integrity projects. The extent to which cooperation on a component is likely to be beneficial and effectively may depend on two dimensions: When assessing the potential for cooperative approaches, it is recommended that these two dimensions are assessed for each of the components and considering the specific context of the target partners. The application of this approach is discussed for each of the 11 components from a general perspective follows: I1: Appropriate institutional mandates Low to Medium High- Depends on the existing legal structure and institutional frameworks Where relevant to areas of cooperation (e.g. for developing multi-lateral trading agreements), ensure coordination of relevant policies among participating countries to prevent conflicting mandates I2: Capabilities developed Low to High Low- Capabilities required for developing ERC policies fundamentally similar Engage in regional mechanisms such as cooperative networks or alliances to share capabilities and best practices Join efforts in piloting or scaling up technologies for generating ERCs or for digital MRV infrastructure Conduct regional capacity building programs for project developers by mobilizing support from international institutions such as standard bodies I3: Transparency and accountability measures in place High Low- Reporting and whistleblowing mechanisms can benefit from shared platforms; more important for accessibility Establish regional integrity council to organize public consultations, publish data and act as focal contact for whistleblowing Ensure that participating countries are appropriately represented in regional body and that public consultations are adapted in various languages as needed S1: Well-defined asset rights Low High- Depends on country’s laws governing asset and land rights Share best practices for legal safeguards and/or definitions of ERCs that could be adopted in other similar country contexts S2: Streamlined project permitting Low High- Requires ownership from designated state institutions that may differ from country to country Develop framework to harmonize regional standard for high-quality ERCs that sets requirements for project permitting for non-legal aspects (e.g. MRV set-up, governance structure etc.) S3: Globally accepted methodologies High Low- Need for localization only applicable for countries looking to develop their own standards and methodologies to align with their national policies Through establishing regional integrity council, set regional requirements for high-quality ERCs to determine approved standards and methodologies at a regional level; or Set up regional standard and crediting system for ERCs generated in the region, to combine efforts in communicating standard principles to global buyers and coordinate resources needed to develop methodologies and crediting system infrastructure S4: Defined benefit-sharing frameworks Medium Medium to High- Standardized best practices for benefit-sharing can strengthen trust in market safeguards for protecting local community rights, but require localized approach for establishing frameworks given differences in local culture, community structures and technical and administrative capacity Establish regional minimum standards for broad benefit-sharing principles (e.g. requirement for benefit-sharing for specific project types, templatized document for reporting on benefit-sharing plan, etc.) Share best practices for effective benefit-sharing frameworks among countries with similar community structures V1: Robust MRV approaches High Low to Medium- Setup of mechanism may require adaptation of methodologies to suit local context, but mechanisms for reporting and verification can benefit from shared infrastructure Develop framework to harmonize regional MRV standard, such as for additionality assessment and leakage and non-permanence safeguards Set up regional digital database for verified/approved ERCs V2: Adequate VVB capabilities Medium to High Low- Need for localization only applicable for countries looking to develop their own standards and methodologies, where specific VVB expertise and/or accreditation may be needed Establish region-wide process or platform for accrediting VVBs Conduct regional capacity building programs for auditing or environmental services companies in the region to develop ERC auditing capabilities, offering expedited accreditation for these new VVBs D1: Defined Article 6 transaction frameworks Low to High High- Depends on country’s NDCs and national priorities Set up annual regional conferences to share best practices and align national Article 6 frameworks with regional carbon market development objectives D2: Develops trading infrastructure & mechanisms High Low- Initiatives to market ERCs in global market can benefit from a coordinated approach, where localization is only needed for outreach within domestic market Establish multi-lateral trade mechanisms between buyer countries and region, to supply ERCs as a region Set up a regional carbon trade/exchange platform for domestic, regional and international ERC trading Footnote 1: Rational for resources needed indicated in the deep-dive of each component in the Framework Component Deep Dives .
Resources needed1
Localization needed
Opportunities for regional cooperation
This section is intended to be a living document and will be reviewed at regular intervals. The Guidelines have not been prepared with any specific transaction in mind and are meant to serve only as general guidance. It is therefore critical that the Guidelines be reviewed and adapted for specific transactions. Unless expressly stated otherwise, the findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in the Materials in this Site are those of the various authors of the Materials and are not necessarily those of The World Bank Group, its member institutions, or their respective Boards of Executive Directors or member countries. For feedback on the content of this section of the website or suggestions for links or materials that could be included, please contact the PPPLRC at ppp@worldbank.org.
Updated: April 5, 2024
TABLE OF CONTENTS
UNLOCKING GLOBAL EMISSION REDUCTION CREDIT
Strategic Guidance for Country System Assessments
1. Introduction to Emission Reduction Credits
• The World Bank's Emission Reduction Program
• Classification of Emissions Reduction Credit
• Policy Context of Emissions Reduction Credit
2. Objective of the Strategic Guidance for Country System Assessments
• Objective of these Guidelines
• Introduction to the Country System Assessment Framework
• Process to conducting assessments
3. Framework Component Deep Dives
• I1: Appropriate Institutional Mandates
• I3: Transparency and Accountability Mechanisms in Place
• S1: Well-Defined Asset Rights
• S2: Streamlined Project Permitting
• S3: Globally Accepted Methodologies
• S4: Defined Benefit-Sharing Frameworks
• V2: Adequate VVB Capabilities
• D1: Defined Article 6 Transaction Frameworks
• D2: Develops Trading Infrastructure & Mechanisms
4. Scope for Further Refinements
• Appendix A: Approach for Cooperative Approaches
• Appendix B: Sample Country Assessment Pages