Assets Recycling Process in Islamic Finance
Photo Credit: Image by Pixabay
On this page: Find following Asset Recycling Process below, or visit the Guidelines for Implementing Asset Recycling Transactions Section Overview and Content Outline, or Download Full Report for more.
In simple terms, the bankability of an asset refers to the willingness of fund providers to fund against such asset as collateral. Bankability is assessed through a number of factors depending on the nature of the asset, but, apart for the actual value of the asset, most factors revolve around four elements: It is to be noted that it is not the fund providers nor the commercial banks that make an asset bankable. Rather, it's their role to assess the bankability of an asset and, if found acceptable, provide the funds. As this is a subjective measurement, what constitutes a bankable asset will vary depending on the asset itself as well as the fund provider. In asset recycling, the key aspects that fund providers typically consider when determining if an asset is bankable include: For fund providers, collateralising of a portfolio of assets can rise the probability of repayment and decrease the need to monitor the government (and the related costs). The value of the portfolio of assets is affected by how easily it can be enforced; if collateral is difficult to enforce, it is no longer obvious what creditors can expect to recover. Nonetheless, collateralising a portfolio of assets can in principle allow lending in risky situations that would not otherwise be financed. For governments, collateralising a portfolio of assets can increase market access and reduce financing costs. But, it can also have negative impacts. The collateralising of a portfolio of assets can raise the risk of debt distress by making it easier to over borrow. Complex collateralisation portfolios can both raise costs and contribute to transparency problems. Governments should avoid recycling complex forms of portfolios. Greater complexity makes it more difficult to assess all-in costs, especially in countries where capacity is weak. It can also translate into higher transaction costs and legal risks. Complexity can also contribute to non-transparency and corruption. Asset recycling transactions generally involve complex elements, often consist of different related agreements, and may involve additional costs such as export credit agency fees, remuneration of financial intermediaries, legal fees, and non-monetary "costs", such as step-in rights, and other controls over the management and disposal of the recycled asset. Adding to this complex base with other features or complications - for instance, complex collateralization portfolios - is thus highly undesirable. Green assets are those assets that have a favourable impact on the natural environment. They can be companies or projects committed to the conservation of natural resources, pollution reduction, or other environmentally conscious business practices. While recycling green assets may attract fund providers keen to support green initiatives, green assets can be as valuable as traditional assets. Governments can also grant tax incentives such as tax exemption and tax credits, making green assets more attractive for recycling compared to a traditional value comparable asset. These tax advantages provide a monetary incentive to tackle prominent social issues such as climate change and a movement toward renewable sources of energy. Green assets become of greater relevance in sukuk based asset recycling transaction where the sukuk will be offered to the general public. While this may vary from country to country, individual investors have been found to prefer green investments over traditional investments. For any secured fund provider, the recycled asset is of little benefit and cannot motivate improved terms and conditions unless it is enforceable. A government must weigh the benefit of improved borrowing terms against the potential loss of recycled asset, which in some cases could have a significant political impact on the government and society. Enforceability depends on the type of recycled asset and the governing law of the jurisdiction in which it is located. Generally speaking, large escrow accounts in the secured fund provider's jurisdiction are the most readily enforceable (but typically cover only a small portion of the funds), followed by assets which are located outside the governments' jurisdiction (e.g., equity shares in a company). Movable assets (e.g., oil cargoes) can also be subject to enforcement actions. Assets within the government's jurisdiction are typically harder to enforce. In any financing transaction, the fund providers generally perform a due diligence exercise over the obligors' business activities and general financial condition to assess the risks of the transaction and, therefore, the likelihood of repayment. However, in asset recycling the fund providers depend more on the revenue stream generated by the asset in question. This nature of asset recycling transactions means that the asset and its revenues will need to ring-fenced to ensure that they remain available for repayment of the funds advanced by the fund providers. The fund providers in an asset recycling will dig beyond the usually limited balance sheet of the government into the details of the asset's potentially complex web of contractual rights and obligations and government authorisations and consents to gain a full understanding of the economic value of the asset. As a general rule, an asset recycling due diligence exercise will focus on identifying the matters that could materially affect the economic viability of the asset (for example, potential excessive liabilities on the asset, premature termination of an important offtake or supply agreement or the loss of a key license, authorisation or property right) and the availability and effectiveness of security to be crated over the asset to support the financing (for example, whether any provision of the asset related agreements or feature of underlying local law would materially impair the fund providers' available recourse to the asset). Additionally, the due diligence process should include a Shari'ah compatibility analysis with the aim of identifying and resolving any potential Shari'ah breaches. The Shari'ah compatibility analysis would look into the structure of the transaction, the recycled assets and the transaction documents. In certain countries, an external Shari'ah audit may be required before an asset recycling transaction can be described as being Shari'ah-compliant. Other than as discussed above, an asset recycling due diligence exercise will generally follow the same process of an investment or privatisation due diligence including: Governments should be prepared to respond to the due diligence request lists and provide the requested information for the asset recycling due diligence exercise to complete and achieve its goals. If a certain aspect of request lists cannot be addressed or disclosed, reasonable justifications ideally should be provided. Cooperation with the due diligence exercise makes the asset recycling transaction smother and increases its success likelihood. Underwriting has more than one meaning depending on the context in which it is used. In the context of asset recycling through Islamic finance, the financiers (usually the arrangers) which promise to extend the underwritten sum of money to the obligor, if the financing is not fully subscribed at the end of the syndication period. A financing may be arranged on an underwritten or a best-efforts basis (or best endeavours). If it is underwritten, the underwriting financiers (the "underwriters" and usually also arrangers) guarantee the entire commitment and then syndicate the financing facility. If the financing is not fully subscribed, they will extend the underwritten sum of money to the obligor themselves. An underwritten financing will typically attract higher fees than syndicated financing on a best-efforts basis. The syndicated financing market is a major contributor to debt finance, particularly for large-scale financing. A syndicated financing is offered by a group, or a syndicate, of financiers to an obligor. When a large financing is needed that a single bank cannot manage alone, a group of banks can pool together and offer a syndicated financing. The benefit of a syndicated financing is that the credit risk is spread over the participants in the syndicate, and the individual bank can participate in a financial transaction it would otherwise not be able to manage alone. The key players in an assets recycling can be the same as in a typical syndicated financing including lead banks, bookrunners, mandated lead arrangers (MLAS), a coordinator, participant financiers, documentation bank/agent, facility/investment agent, trustee/security agent and credit ratings agencies. In the case of a default by the obligor in the payment of any amount on the due date under a financing agreement, the financiers cannot increase the amount due to them in response to the obligor's default and missed payment due date. However, the obligor may be required to undertake in the relevant financing agreements to pay a prescribed amount for a charitable purpose in the case of the late payment in lieu of a fine or equivalent late fee / payment increase. The payment so recovered by the financiers from the obligor shall not form part of the income of the financiers. The financiers are generally required, as per the principles of Shari'ah, to spend the late payment amount for a charitable purpose on behalf of the obligor after deducting any actual and direct costs incurred by the financiers due to such late payment. Where more than one financier is involved in a financing, it is expected that an investment agency agreement would be entered into between the financiers. Pursuant to an investment agency agreement, the financiers will appoint one of the Islamic finance participants or an external financial institution as their agent in relation to their participation in the financing and (if the financing structure so requires) to hold title to the assets on their behalf and for their benefit. An investment agency agreement includes the financier's and the investment agent's rights and obligations, the funding allocation and disbursement mechanism. While it is not an essential requirement for an obligor to be a party to an investment agency agreement, oftentimes the obligor is made a party to this document. Where the financiers choose to establish an SPV for holding title to the assets, the investment agency agreement may set out provisions for the establishment of the SPV and the rights and obligations of the SPV. The financiers may choose to use a special purpose vehicle ("SPV") to act on their behalf in an Islamic finance transaction. As Islamic finance is an asset-based or asset-backed financing, the use of an SPV in certain types of Islamic finance structures may provide certain benefits to both the financiers and the obligor. In the case of the financiers, they are protected from the risks associated with the ownership of the underlying assets; for example, environmental liability. In the case of the obligor, because the assets are not held by the financiers directly, the obligor and the assets are isolated from the risk of insolvency of an financier. The use of a SPV may also help overcome issues preventing foreign ownership (in jurisdictions where such restrictions apply). However, incorporating an SPV could be time consuming and administratively burdensome. Also, the parties may not agree to incur the relevant costs involved in incorporating an SPV. The use of an SPV may raise some structuring issues related to the impact of the intervening SPV on the contractual relationships between the financiers and the obligor. Holding title to the underlying assets by an SPV may also have some tax implication in some jurisdictions. Accordingly, proper due diligence will be conducted before using an SPV in the financing structure. Set out below are a list of transaction documents which are generally common in a financing transaction where two or more financiers extend financing on separate financing arrangements to an obligor: As Islamic finance is an asset-based / asset-backed financing, Islamic finance transactions often require multiple title transfers of underlying assets, which may trigger double or even triple tax charges in some jurisdictions. Because of the tax implication, utilizing certain Islamic finance products could be costly and uneconomical in some jurisdictions. Certain jurisdictions have made some changes to their tax laws to create a "level playing field" so that Islamic finance products are taxed in the same way as equivalent conventional financial products. In some jurisdictions, certain Islamic finance structures are favored over other structures due to the tax implications which need to be carefully examined on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis. Both the provider and recipient of an Islamic finance facility should carefully consider tax issues before choosing an Islamic finance product and the structure involved in implementing such product. Furthermore, it needs to be carefully considered whether any payment related to an Islamic finance transaction would be subject to withholding tax as well as whether an Islamic finance mechanism should be accounted for as a debt financing arrangement or otherwise both for the obligor and for the financiers (in terms of accounting and tax deductibility purposes). Hedging in general is permitted by the principles of Shari'ah. From an Islamic finance point of view, hedging is an attempt by a party to mitigate or reduce the level of risk inherent to a financing transaction. Many forms of Islamic hedging instruments have been developed in recent years. Shari'ah compliant hedging instruments currently available in the market include Islamic forward FX, Islamic options, Islamic profit rate swaps and Islamic currency swaps. The Bahrain-based International Islamic Financial Market (IIFM) and the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) have jointly developed certain types of Shari'ah compliant hedging instruments (including, Islamic foreign exchange forward, Islamic cross-currency swaps and profit rate swaps) which are reported to be widely used by market participants. In an Islamic finance transaction, the financiers may require that an obligor use one or more Shari'ah compliant hedging instruments to mitigate certain risks (e.g., currency or profit rate) related to the obligor's obligations under such financing. A financier may also hedge its own exposure to a financing transaction. Takaful or Shari'ah compliant insurance is a form of insurance based on principles of mutuality and co-operation, encompassing the elements of shared responsibility, joint indemnity, common interest and solidarity. Some Islamic financiers may require that the insurance to be procured by an obligor be placed with Shari'ah compliant insurers on a takaful basis if adequate and viable relevant insurance cover is available from satisfactory and creditworthy insurers on commercially reasonable terms. Whilst takaful products have been available in the market for some time, only a handful of institutions may offer takaful products relevant to an asset recycling transaction. The Islamic Corporation for the Insurance of Investment and Export Credit (ICIEC), a member of the Islamic Development Bank Group (IsDBG), is a pioneer in this respect, and is leading the efforts of offering insurance service to cover sovereign risk based on takaful principle. While the use of takaful is recommended, Shari'ah scholars allow conventional insurance to be used in a transaction that are financed wholly or partially by Islamic finance if Islamic insurance products are not available or are not economically feasible. The following legal documentation are expected to be required to implement a sale and leaseback transaction: The following legal documentation are expected to be required to implement a long-term lease and short-term lease (head lease and sub-lease) based transaction: In addition to the documents listed under "Legal documentation for sale and leaseback transaction" above, the following documentation are expected to be required for a sukuk al-ijarah transaction: Islamic finance is based on assumptions of fairness and social responsibility and the fundamentals of Islamic finance share a lot with sustainable finance in terms of custodianship of the earth and responsible and ethical financing. The prospects of Islamic green finance are tremendous. Shifting trends of many institutional investors towards becoming responsible investors reflect that the demand is on an upward trend. There is an optimistic outlook on the gradual but steady growth of Islamic green finance as a broad range of investors are showing continuous interest in green investment products. Islamic finance can be a catalyst for the growth of green developments globally. The concepts of Islamic and green finance have the commonalities that are deeply rooted in the underlying principles of Islamic finance that make clear requirement for the protection of the environment. Furthermore, the Islamic green finance market serves itself as a new marketplace where economic, political and social agents representing different roles and capacities come together. These different agents' interests converge into a shared goal in supporting sustainable growth. Islamic green finance however has to deliver innovative products to set future trends in sustainable financing. Such innovation must be harnessed by having more potential green project issuers coming into the market through creating different types of products and projects. Incorporating sustainability and green standards could be done by establishing a green Islamic finance standard similar to the European green bond standard. Regulations can set a standard for how companies and public authorities can use Islamic finance including green sukuk to raise funds through assets recycling or on capital markets to finance large-scale investments, while meeting tough sustainability requirements and protecting investors. This will be useful for both obligors/issuers and investors of green assets recycling or green bonds. For example, issuers of green bonds will have a robust tool to demonstrate that they are funding legitimate green projects aligned with the EU taxonomy. Green bonds, unlike its counterpart green sukuk, are increasing in issuance growth. In contrast, green sukuk is heading over the opposite direction. There are many reasons as to why this is the case such as the high issuance coast and limited but growing opportunities to fund decarbonization projects. However, there has been growing optimism in this regard since Shari'ah compliant investors would have no choice but invest in green sukuk rather green bonds in the future as more projects arise and grow. Despite the down turns, efforts have been made with new projects appearing annually. The Islamic Development Bank ("IsDB") has been one of the leading Islamic financial institutions to promote and participate in green and sustainably sukuk. In accordance with its US$25 billion sukuk issuance programme, this multilateral entity raised EUR 1 billion from its 5-year sukuk issue under the programme. The IsDB were to use the proceeds from the first green issuance to fund a variety of green and climate change projects in its 57 member nations. Projects for sustainable water and wastewater management, clean transportation, energy efficiency, pollution prevention and control, and environmentally sound management of natural resources and land use are among these.Assets selection and eligibility criteria
Due diligence process
Underwriting process
Key structuring issues and legal documentation
Incorporating sustainability and green standards into Islamic finance products
The Guidelines have not been prepared with any specific transaction in mind and are meant to serve only as general guidance. It is therefore critical that the Guidelines be reviewed and adapted for specific transactions To find more, visit the Guidelines to Implementing Asset Recycling Transactions Section Overview and Content Outline, or Download the Full Report.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. GUIDELINES FOR IMPLEMENTING ASSET RECYCLING
7. Bundling and Unbundling Criteria
8. Climate Finance in Asset Recycling
9. Islamic Finance and Asset Recycling
• Introduction: Islamic Finance in Asset Recycling
• Key Considerations of Islamic Finance in Assets Recycling
• Overview of Assets Recycling Through Islamic Finance
• Assets Recycling Process in Islamic Finance
• Case Studies on Islamic Finance for Asset Recycling
• Way Forward for Countries to Tap Into Asset Recycling Through Islamic Finance
Related Content
Additional Resources
PPP Processes and Institutional Responsibilities
Type of ResourcePPP Process
Type of Resource