In Latin America, privatization started earlier and spread farther and more rapidly than in almost any other part of the world.  More, and larger, firms were sold, and more proceeds were raised.   Despite positive microeconomic results,

privatization is highly and increasingly unpopular in the region. The core social criticism is that privatization contributes to growing poverty and inequality levels in Latin America—and circumstantial evidence supports the claim.  But recent and rigorous studies dilute or counter  the negative views, concluding that privatization has contributed only slightly to rising unemployment and inequality, and either reduces poverty or has no effect on it.  Still, while privatization may be winning the economic battle it is losing the political war:  The benefits are spread

widely, small for each affected consumer or taxpayer, and occur (or accrue) in the medium-term.  In contrast, the costs are large for those concerned, who tend to be visible, vocal, urban and organized, a potent political  combination.