PPIAF Annual Report 2016

PPPIAF Annual Report
Publication Date:
Jan 01, 2017
Region:
Language:
Nature:

Key highlights of this report include:

  • Increased relevance of PPIAF through programs: PPIAF continued to adopt a more considered approach through the use of programmatic grants, approvals of which increased by 40 percent compared to last year . PPIAF supported seven technical assistance programs developed in past years and designed and approved six new programs . These were originated and are to be implemented in close collaboration with development partners, leveraging their expertise and co-financing .
  • Maintained focus on countries with the greatest need for our services: Half of PPIAF’s new grants are in Sub- Saharan Africa, 60 percent are in lowest-income countries (Development Assistance Committee (DAC) 1 and 2 countries), and one out of six are in fragile and conflict-affected countries.
  • Increased oversight of activities through newly endorsed results framework: PPIAF approved a new results framework in May, which better reflects the hierarchy of results according to PPIAF’s theory of change and business model . It incorporates the many M&E tools and improvements that we have instituted in recent years (e .g ., the balanced scorecard approach) and more specifically reflects the contribution of Sub-National Technical Assistance (SNTA) activities to the overall results.
  • Focus on delivering knowledge to practitioners who need it: Fiscal 2016 marked the second year that PPIAF took a structured approach to designing and producing knowledge products as part of its aspiration to become a center of excellence in private participation in infrastructure . Of note were two successful knowledge calls for proposals, generating high demand and resulting in $2 million worth of support for 13 knowledge activities across PPIAF’s thematic priority areas, while leveraging an additional $1 .7 million in co-financing from partners.
  • Continued tightening and streamlining of portfolio: There was a 40-percent reduction in “stale” activities delayed by more than 12 months.

Disclaimer: The resources on this site is usually managed by third party websites. The World Bank does not take responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or quality of the information provided, or for any broken links or moved resources. Any changes in the underlying website or link may result in changes to the analysis and recommendations set forth on the Public-Private Partnership Resource Center. The inclusion of documents on this website should not be construed as either a commitment to provide financing or an endorsement by the World Bank of the quality of the document or project. If you have any comments on any of the links provided on the Public-Private Partnership Resource Center, please get in touch here