This is a new section of the Public-Private Partnership Resource Center website and is currently in draft form. Your feedback is welcome: If you would like to comment on the content of this section of the website or if you have suggestions for links or materials that could be included please contact us at ppp@worldbank.org.

Type of Resource
Right Block Title
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Right Block Description

UNLOCKING GLOBAL EMISSION REDUCTION CREDIT


Guidance for Countries in Assessing ERC Projects


1. Introduction to Emission Reduction Credits

 The World Bank's Emission Reduction Program

 Emission Reduction Credits

Classification of Emissions Reduction Credit

 Policy Context of Emissions Reduction Credit

2. Objective of the Guidance for Countries in Assessing ERC Projects

 Objective of Project Preparation Guidelines

 Introduction to the Project Assessment Framework

 Process to Conducting Assessments

3. Determining Country Inputs

 S1: Green Economy Priorities

 S3: Article 6 Readiness and Eligibility

4. Conducting the Initial Profiling and Making a Preliminary Decision

 F1: Project ERC Value

 F2: Additional Value Enabled by Project

 C1, C2, and C3: Carbon Integrity and Environmental and Social Risk Management

 S2: Socioeconomic Value

5. Conducting the Project Assessment and Making the Final Decision

 F1: Project ERC value and F2: Additional Value Enabled by Project

 Q1: MRV Infrastructure

 Q2: Marketing, Sales, and Pricing

 Q3: Project Governance and Structure

 C1: Carbon Integrity

 C2: Environmental Risk Management

 C3: Social Risk Management and Benefits

 S2: Socioeconomic Value

6. Further Guidance for Application

 Market-Driven Factors

 Country Context-driven Factors

 Considerations for Future Scope

Abbreviations: Guidance for Countries in Assessing ERC Projects

Appendices: 

• A: Project Profile Template 

• B: Project Assessment Template 

• C: PPP Models for ERP

  - Model 1: MRT Energy Efficiencies Model for ERP

  - Model 2: Rural Electrification Model for ERP

  - Model 3: LED Streetlight Deployment Model for ERP - for Efficient Outdoor and Street Lighting Technologies

  - Model 4: Rooftop Solar Installation Model for ERP

  - Model 5: LED Streetlight Deployment Model for ERP - for Specific Technologies

  - Model 6: E-bus Deployment Model for ERP

  - Model 7: EV Charging Systems Installation Model for ERP

  - Model 8: Biodigesters Deployment Model for ERP

  - Model 9: Waste-to-Power Model for ERP

  - Model 10: Waste Treatment Facility Model for ERP

  - Model 11: Climate Smart Farming Deployment Model for ERP

  -  Model 12: Reforestation Program Model for ERP 

 

Find Full Outline

Waste-to-Power Model for ERP

Photo Credit: Image by Freepik

On this page: Waste-to-Power leveraging a New-Build-Finance-Bulk-Tariffs model -  Model 9 in the ERP Project Guidelines.  Read more below, or visit Strategic Guidance for Country System AssessmentsGuidance for Countries in Assessing ERC Projects, or Mobilizing ERC Finance


Project Type: Tech-based avoidance project

Sector: Waste

Applicable Project Methodology: ACM0001 – Consolidated baseline and monitoring methodology for landfill gas project activities

The activities under the project are designed to establish a system that can collect, transport, and treat landfill gas, with the purpose of generating electricity for the project's own use and selling any surplus power to the grid.

Proposed Structure of this Public Private Partnership (PPP) Model

The project will be leveraging a New-Build-Finance-Bulk-Tariffs model. To enable alignment of interests, a new project company may be formed in which the operator of the landfill partners with an experienced power producer. The waste will be collected from the landfill to the new facility to be built, requiring tipping fees to be paid by the current landfill operator for the reduction of waste under its management. In return, the landfill operator may benefit from the sale of the emission reduction credits (ERCs) in the voluntary carbon markets, as well as the sale of power to distributors via the new project company, of which it holds equity interest. The grantor will provide the concession to build and operate the waste-to-power facilities for a fixed period, after which it will take over ownership and operation.

Table 1: Model Attributes

Dimension
Attribute
Description

Business

New

This model assumes that the private entity currently provided the concession to operate the landfill will be provided the authorization to engage in this project in partnership with an experienced power producer, creating a new entity that will enable alignment of interests.

Existing

Construction

Build

The model involves building new infrastructure to enable the landfill gas capture, as well as the waste-to-power plant in the vicinity of the landfill.

Refurbish

Private Funding

Finance

The project company will be charged with raising financing for the new installation, both from financial institutions as well as the voluntary carbon markets.

Service

Bulk

Revenues of the project company will be coming from the power distributors that it engages with for the sale of power generated by the plant.

User

Revenues

Fees

Revenues in this model will originate from the electricity tariffs to be paid as contracted by power distributors

Tariffs

Proposed risk allocation of the Public Private Partnership Model

Key features of PPP structure

  • Private sector entity to design, build, finance, operate and maintain landfill gas plant via concession agreement with the ministry/ government or state-owned entity
  • The private sector entity acts as the implementation partner, and is responsible for all activities related to the implementation, management, monitoring and reporting of the project over the project crediting period
  • In exchange, private sector entity can earn the revenue from the ERCs generated from the project
  • The government or state-owned entity benefits from the cost savings from not needing to treat landfill waste

Expected ERC end use

  • End use can belong to project developer as part of additional revenue stream

Key considerations/risks for proposed project

  • Extensive stakeholder engagement required to ensure buy-in from operators of landfill sites as well as any other relevant stakeholders
  • Need to ensure adequate technical local expertise in day-to-day execution to ensure minimal carbon leakage from treatment of landfill waste
  • Stable political environment key to enable smooth execution of landfill gas
  • Partnering with a service provider for the project’s marketing, sales and pricing is needed to identify potential offset buyers, negotiate contracts, and secure good target price per tonne to enable the financial viability of ERC generation
  • Contracting a monitoring, verification and reporting (MRV) service provider with experience in conducting MRV and preparing the necessary documents for generating ERCs in a voluntary carbon market standard will reduce risk of registration and issuance delays or bottlenecks, and strengthen credibility of project’s carbon integrity quality

Figure 1: Financing and Activity Flows for the Model

Case study: Exploitation of the Biogas from Controlled Landfill in Solid Waste Management Central, Brazil

Project description

This project includes a system to collect, transport, and treat landfill gas, generating electricity for self-use and feeding into the national grid. The project reduces greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by destroying methane in high-temperature flares, which has 21 times greater GHG potential than carbon dioxide, and replacing electricity from fossil fuels.

The landfill site in which landfill gas is collected occupies a total area of 114.9 hectares (ha), with 65 ha planned for municipal waste treatment and disposal. The landfill serves the municipality of Belo Horizonte in Brazil which has a population of 2.7 million (M) residents.

Targeted results

Expected annual ERCs generated from the program will be 112,011 tonnes.

Figure 2: Structure of Case Study PPP

Consórcio Horizonte Asja signed a concession contract between Municipality of Belo Horizonte to have the right to exploit the landfill gas arising from wastes from the CTRS / BR.040 landfill. Consórcio will invest and operate its landfill gas electricity plant that collects waste from the CTRS / BR.040 landfill. The renewable electricity generated from the plant will be sold to the national grid. At the end of concession agreement, the project will be transferred back to municipality of Belo Horizonte.

Summary of the model financials

Assuming a similar project context as the case study, the estimated Net Present Value (NPV) without ERC in- and outflows – only considering non-ERC inflows through other revenue streams or cost savings enabled by the project – is negative at $1.7M1. With ERC cashflows, the total project will still have a negative NPV of $1.5M, which helps make landfill gas projects a bit more financially viable. It should be noted that the overall NPV of project will likely improve beyond ERC crediting period as revenue generated from electricity sale continue to recur.

Table 2: Summary of sources of inflows and outflows and key assumptions

Value component
Assumptions
Sources

ERC revenues or inflows

  • Three issuances across the project’s 10-year crediting period, at year 3, year 7 and year 10
  • $7.35 per tonne today for 43,860 estimated tonnes of ERCs likely generated in the first issuance
  • 10% price increase to $8.09 for 87,720 estimated tonnes of ERCs likely generated for the second and third issuance

Average price of Waste Disposal project in Asia, VCS and GS

Non-ERC revenues or inflows

  • Annual average output of 17,479 megawatt hours (MWh)
  • Annual expected electricity sale of $1,025,767
  • Expected electricity sale of $58.70 per MWh

Brazil landfill gas benchmark

Project investment and implementation cost

  • Total investment cost of $5,086,037
  • Annual plant operation cost of $485,042
  • Annual operation cost on ERC production of $165,612

Brazil landfill gas benchmark

ERC generation

  • $10,000 for the project’s registration and first issuance
  • $15,000 for each verification process across three issuance cycles
  • $0.14 per tonne for subsequent issuances

Verra Fee Schedule

Table 3: Net cashflows summary (in USD)

Components
Sum of initial outlays
Sum of in- or outflows from crediting period
Total cashflow

ERC Component

Revenues/Inflows

0

653,987

653,987

Costs/Outflows

0

-52,522

-52,522

Net value

0

601,465

601,465

Primary/Non-ERC Component

Revenues/Inflows

0

10,257,674

10,257,674

Costs/Outflows

-5,086,037

-6,506,543

-11,592,579

Net value

-5,086,037

3,751,131

-1,334,906

Net Present Values

NPV

-$1,541,960

NPV (ERC Component)

$178,826

NPV (Non-ERC Component)

-$1,720,787

 


Footnote 1: All prices are expressed in United states Dollars (USD)

Note(s):

This section is intended to be a living document and will be reviewed at regular intervals. The Guidelines have not been prepared with any specific transaction in mind and are meant to serve only as general guidance. It is therefore critical that the Guidelines be reviewed and adapted for specific transactions. Unless expressly stated otherwise, the findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in the Materials in this Site are those of the various authors of the Materials and are not necessarily those of The World Bank Group, its member institutions, or their respective Boards of Executive Directors or member countries. For feedback on the content of this section of the website or suggestions for links or materials that could be included, please contact the Public-Private Partnership Resource Center at ppp@worldbank.org.

 

 

Download Page as PDF


Updated:

UNLOCKING GLOBAL EMISSION REDUCTION CREDIT


Guidance for Countries in Assessing ERC Projects


1. Introduction to Emission Reduction Credits

 The World Bank's Emission Reduction Program

 Emission Reduction Credits

Classification of Emissions Reduction Credit

 Policy Context of Emissions Reduction Credit

2. Objective of the Guidance for Countries in Assessing ERC Projects

 Objective of Project Preparation Guidelines

 Introduction to the Project Assessment Framework

 Process to Conducting Assessments

3. Determining Country Inputs

 S1: Green Economy Priorities

 S3: Article 6 Readiness and Eligibility

4. Conducting the Initial Profiling and Making a Preliminary Decision

 F1: Project ERC Value

 F2: Additional Value Enabled by Project

 C1, C2, and C3: Carbon Integrity and Environmental and Social Risk Management

 S2: Socioeconomic Value

5. Conducting the Project Assessment and Making the Final Decision

 F1: Project ERC value and F2: Additional Value Enabled by Project

 Q1: MRV Infrastructure

 Q2: Marketing, Sales, and Pricing

 Q3: Project Governance and Structure

 C1: Carbon Integrity

 C2: Environmental Risk Management

 C3: Social Risk Management and Benefits

 S2: Socioeconomic Value

6. Further Guidance for Application

 Market-Driven Factors

 Country Context-driven Factors

 Considerations for Future Scope

Abbreviations: Guidance for Countries in Assessing ERC Projects

Appendices: 

• A: Project Profile Template 

• B: Project Assessment Template 

• C: PPP Models for ERP

  - Model 1: MRT Energy Efficiencies Model for ERP

  - Model 2: Rural Electrification Model for ERP

  - Model 3: LED Streetlight Deployment Model for ERP - for Efficient Outdoor and Street Lighting Technologies

  - Model 4: Rooftop Solar Installation Model for ERP

  - Model 5: LED Streetlight Deployment Model for ERP - for Specific Technologies

  - Model 6: E-bus Deployment Model for ERP

  - Model 7: EV Charging Systems Installation Model for ERP

  - Model 8: Biodigesters Deployment Model for ERP

  - Model 9: Waste-to-Power Model for ERP

  - Model 10: Waste Treatment Facility Model for ERP

  - Model 11: Climate Smart Farming Deployment Model for ERP

  -  Model 12: Reforestation Program Model for ERP 

 

Find Full Outline